← All checked meetingsRedline · January 6, 2025
Las Cruces Council Meeting - January 6, 2025
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 27 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 27 were found in the recording.
Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
You: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“not”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “not” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “is part of your compliance with adequately noticing a meeting and providing the”.
What the minutes say
You said it was brand new. This was a part of the agenda that was posted online. This should have been there too. You see you sprung it on the public. We do not have an opportunity to ask questions that are based upon really any analysis at all because you have failed to provide this. So that goes along, should go along with all the meeting materials and that is part of your compliance with adequately noticing a meeting and providing the agenda and I would say that you have failed with respect to suddenly springing all of these CIP amendments which are obviously important upon us. So that is a noncompliance with the Open Meetings Act.
What the recording says
it was brand new okay um this was a part of the agenda that was posted online this should have been there too you see You' sprung it on the public we do not have an opportunity to ask questions that are based upon really any analysis at all because you have failed to provide this so that goes along should go along with all the other meeting materials and that is part of your compliance with adequately not singing a meeting and providing the agenda and I would say you have failed with respect to suddenly springing all the CIP amendments which are obvious obviously important upon us so that's a non-compliance with the open meetings Act any questions you you know with that said and I agree uh
“eviction” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
mentors can help young people set career goals and help connect mentees to IND industry professionals to train for and find a job and whereas effective mentoring it of underserved and vulnerable populations of young people helps them confront challenges and enjoy improved mental health and social emotional well-being and whereas young people with a
“asbestos” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
an Innovative evidence-based practice and uniquely is both a prevention and intervention strategy that can support young people of all demographics and backgrounds in all aspects of of their lives and whereas despite the benefits of mentoring one young person of every of every three and growing up without a mentor which means a third
“litigation” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
public participation and we have Katrina up here that will help uh get you to the podium everyone will have three minutes on no pending litigation or discussions of items on the nonconsent uh today we do have an item uh 7.1 which is resolution number 25 078 uh to cure and ratify the decision
~1300 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “litigation”, “noncompliance”, “conflict of interest”, “investigation”, “resign”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
practice and whereas the city of Las Cruses New Mexico recognizes the contributions of volunteer mentors in the following programs kids can Community Action Agency of southern New Mexico the Boys and Girls Club of Las Cruses Big Brothers Big Sisters mountain region lava project americore FYI plus greatest factor LLC and crues creatives who link youth to economic and social opportunity while also strengthening our community and whereas mentoring generally has a significant positive impact on youth academic achievement school connectedness and engagement and educational success which can lead
“Steuart David Uh” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes
Speaker not namedSomeone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
housing but don't tell me it's not cookie cutter thank you very much thank you good afternoon my name is steuart David uh I'm here in part to apologize for not doing my homework as I mentioned before I'm a new Resident when I attended the work session about the proposed animal Orin ordinance and I heard all the controversy
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
you good afternoon I can't see anything okay good afternoon uh mayor and counselors Cynthia Campo CIP analyst and today I bring a resolution for the um CIP amendments um Within These amendments we have uh three types of CIP amendments U we have budget to actuals addition of a new project and a name and Department change this is actually um a new slide and I wanted to show the um a summary of the change within the categories in the CIP so you can see that there's the
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.