← All checked meetingsRedline · March 10, 2025
CLC/ DAC Joint Work Session - March 10, 2025
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 56 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 56 were found in the recording.
Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 12 differences
~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “litigation”, “settlement”, “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
an overview uh we'll introduce the advisory Council go through the strategies being recommended by The Advisory Council and then the next steps along with a timeline so through the um litigation process the donana county and city of Los crus will receive approximately $24 million through 2038 uh those settlements are with Distributors manufacturers and retailers some are one-time payments some are payments over a few years some are payments over many years the county will receive um about $14 million and has received just over 5 million to
~1300 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “lawsuit”, “settlement”, “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
in our community we want to focus on racial equity and we also want to be fair and transparent in the process so there is already a website our web page set up on both of our websites so the public can see this information um as The Advisory Group is developing it again the decision making process was well informed with data we worked with New Mexico State University's Crimson research and vital strategies to help conduct A needs assessment and that was presented to all of you several
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.