Jacqueline Rubalcava: figure differs from the recording: minutes say 903000, recording says 93000
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. Both records carry the same sentence, but not the same number. The minutes read “…amount last year i think it was 903,000 that was budgeted including vehicles…” and state 903000; the recording states 93000.
What the minutes say
Jacqueline Rubalcava said the $676,000 for Mano y Mano is based off of the amended service agreement, so the service agreement was for $676,000, so that is what is being budgeted here, there is a carryover from that amount last year I think it was $903,000 that was budgeted, including vehicles, so those vehicles have been ordered and there is also a carryover of that amount.
What the recording says
that I was curious what what's going on there. So, this 676 $676,000 for Mano Mano is based off of the amended service agreement. So, the service agreement was for $676,000 and so that's what is being budgeted here. there is a carryover from that amount. Last year I think it was 93,000 that was budgeted including vehicles. So those vehicles have been ordered and there is also a carryover um of that amount and yeah
~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “investigation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
particular report. Um two different methodologies uh that of course city council will have to choose from. One is by housing type which we've done historically multifamily and single family. Usually different fees are the same fee for those. um or by unit size which is similar to the way it's uh the public safety impact fee um is currently uh been adopted and is being applied. And in this particular case it's it's broken down into three housing types. And then of course the study also includes revenues and
Vote recorded for William Mattiace Mayor City Clerk, who the minutes do not list as present
Vote roll doesn't add upThe vote roll contradicts the same document's own attendance. Motion: adjourn at 3:38 p.m. The attendance roster and the vote roll of the same document disagree about who was in the room.
What the minutes say
adjourn at 3:38 p.m
RESULT: Carried
AYES: Johana Bencomo, Yvonne Flores, Becki Graham, Becky Corran, Eric Enriquez, Cassie McClure, William Mattiace Mayor City Clerk
What the recording says
No matching passage found anywhere in the recording.
~520 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Southwest region. For jobs of the week, we have for the city of Los Cusus the shift supervisor at the MVRDA. That one starts at 27.84 an hour and closes on the 5th of May. We also have street maintenance supervisor starting at $51,000 a year and that one also closes on the 5th. For Donana County, we have supervisor for vector control. That one starts at $44,000 a year and the close the posting closes on the 7th of May. We have a direct support professional and licensed practical
“Jacqueline Andrew Balcava” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes
Speaker not namedSomeone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
start with our uh agenda items 3.1, fiscal year 2025, budget review and public hearing. Good afternoon. My name is Jacqueline Andrew Balcava, budget and grant administrator, and I'm here to present today the proposed budget for FY2526. This year's budget, our theme is is highlighting ways that the Las Cruis's community celebrates Cadinho through local events. So, this is
~1430 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “noncompliance”, “investigation”, “racist”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
cannabis excise tax at 750,000. And this gives us a total for the general fund of revenue at 166.5 million. Where your money goes, this is again just for the general fund. Our expenditures for the general fund are largely made up of personnel at 69% or 120.2 million followed by operating at 31% or 53.4 million and then capital is a small amount at 342,000 giving us the total budgeted expenditures at 174 million for the general fund for FY26. We wanted to highlight the transfers that are currently
~2340 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “resign”, “racist”, “harassment”, “contamination”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
of a building or a street reconstruction. So with that as you can see our process is is significant but most of all the CIP process and the document of it it's required by city charger. The document prioritizes capital needs and identify potential sources associated with those projects. It informs the selection of the legislative pri priorities. As we know, the state has a process every year where we submit uh projects to be considered for capital outlay or funding uh for uh legislative from the legislative session. It
~2210 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “lawsuit”, “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”, “immigration”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
is a prototypical type of park with uh these types of amenities uh within the park. Uh and then we show here again providing some options with either with neighborhood parks and without uh or both of those options, we have a cost per person that's assigned to that level of service. So with neighborhood parks, we're at a higher amount of about uh $1600 per person, $1655. and without neighborhood parks applying that level of service of about 1,274. Then we move on to trails. Uh and the trails
~1170 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “contamination”, “cancer”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
2022 GOB bond updates is Miss Natalie Green, our housing neighborhood revitalization administrator. As you all may recall, our community approved four projects and four questions. Just as a reminder on that bond question or that election question, sorry, for a new fire station number nine, the continuation of the East Mesa Public Wreck complex, affordable housing and park improvements. As part of our last update in January, the new fire station was approximately 10%. We're working on finishing up the roughens and also the exterior footings. At this point
~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
uh Padrina Senior Apartments and I will talk while this video plays. They are at 74% completion. Um the exterior is almost completely done. There's um some minor cleanup that needs to occur. Uh they are working on finishing what's the western wing. Um and then once uh the elevators come in, they want to phase occupancy. So, they want to um lease up the entire west wing and then they'll finish out the east wing. And so, they've just finished uh their dog park. All the stuckco's done. Um