~3640 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “conflict of interest”, “investigation”, “resign”, “discrimination”, “lead”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Music] You're live. Well, good afternoon everyone. Welcome to the city council meeting. Today is Monday, May 19th, 2025. It's approximately 1 p.m. I'm Mayor Eric Enriquez. Before we start, I want to mention that we have a ASL American Sign Language interpreter up front if needed. Uh we will start with a moment of silence for the brave men and women of the United States Armed Forces as they protect our interests around the globe as well as the courageous men and women of the Los Cusus
“ice” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
go ahead and help me give them another round of applause, please? So, these individuals show up day in day out. Rain, shine, dust, wind, ice, snow, pandemic, you name it. Because of that, they provide the best possible service to our community for a better quality of life. That way, all of us in
“corrupt” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
in the '90s, but I have heard from people say they remember seeing it earlier than 2005. The eagle looks as if it was carved into a dead tree in that location or they might have sunk it into the ground. It's hard to tell. Here you can see in more detail. The assessment
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
does state that anyone can have a ordinance reconsidered if they file a petition within 30 days of adoption. So the charter also states that initiative and referendum petitions must have a total of 15% of the last two elections cast for city council. So for this petition that came out to 3,240 valid signatures. And the other thing that the charter states is that the council will have the final o determination and approval regarding the sufficiency of a petition. So the timeline for this petition, the original petition
Vote recorded for Yvonne, who the minutes do not list as present
Vote roll doesn't add upThe vote roll contradicts the same document's own attendance. Motion: amend the MVEDA funding back to $250,000. The attendance roster and the vote roll of the same document disagree about who was in the room.
What the minutes say
amend the MVEDA funding back to $250,000
RESULT: DEFEATED.
AYES: William Mattiace
What the recording says
No matching passage found anywhere in the recording.
“noncompliance” is said 4× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
agenda? None. Flores. None. None. Grant. None. Next is public participation. We'll allow up to three minutes. No pending litigation or items that are on non-consent. Katrina will come up and help usher you to the podium. Please state your name and speak clearly into the microphone, please. Thanks for your help. Mayor, council, and
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “racist”, “eviction”, “immigration”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
I'm here today to bring a resolution to accept various internal budget adjustments. Before we dive into the overview of the budget adjustments, I'd like to share a few reminders, um, the adjustments presented today will primarily focus on updating available balances within our budget. And the following slides only provide a summary of the adjustments requested, but if you would like further detail, please refer to your packets. Fire station 4 located on Missouri and Telshore has a roof leak. We are requesting that budget be set aside in
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “displaced”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Council Dominic Susi. So this is for uh for the station 4 uh re- roof. Um, as you guys can see in the pictures, the roof is in pretty rough shape. Um, we've got leaks to multiple dorms and multiple areas of the kitchen. Uh, those leaks are are displacing firefighters at this point. So, um, when the when it rains or sometimes when it snows, we can guarantee that that roof leak is going to come through and and follow the duct work and go into various dorm rooms
~2860 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “noncompliance”, “investigation”, “racist”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
event. We'll start off with all funds expenditures. These are all the funds in the city broken down by fund type. On the first column, we have the FY25 adopted. What that means is this is the amount that you'll see that was adopted in last year's budget. And this is if you refer back to the FY25 budget book. These are the adopted amounts that you will show. The FY25 RBI column is next. What we mean by FY2 by revised is it's the current budget in FY25. So
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
year 2031. Move to approve grant. Second Okay, good afternoon, mayor, city council. My name is Cynthia Lamo, CIP manager with planning and implementation, and I'm here to uh present the FY26231 capital improvements program document. So, I first want to start talking about what are capital improvements, what is actually in the CIP program. So capital projects are long-term investment which includes and it's not limited to when we do an acquisition of land for a public purpose such as buying property for park construction or rehabilitation of infrastructure
~1170 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “contamination”, “asbestos”, “condemnation”, “immigration”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
consistency of attaining sustainable growth with our community. This is a snapshot of the actual document and as you can see we have made some minor uh template revisions to the documents. Hopefully they will facilitate reading the document. It's categorized. It's categorized by the CIP categories. We include the department and the green column is our funded column. Our outer years are are unfunded and this is how we communicate to the community the needs of our city for infrastructure projects. The last column are our funding sources. Those
“Cesy Basconel” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes
Speaker not namedSomeone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
of two public artworks. Move to approve. Graham. Second. Corin. Go ahead when you're ready. Good afternoon. My name is Cesy Basconel. Um I should say mayor and council members. My name is Cesy Basconel and I am here um to present the city art board's recommendation for de accessioning two public art pieces. And I promise those are the
~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “corrupt”, “cancer”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
to be hearing in my presentation. Um, this is the first time we have felt the need to come to council to DXession any of our public art. DXessioning is an important decision that must be determined by the city art board after careful review. According to the public art master plan, deexessioning is a procedure to formally and permanently remove an artwork from the city of Los Cru's public art collection by selling, donating, or destroying it. Murals don't necessarily fall under this um this procedure, but because it
“Jim Hearnst” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes
Speaker not namedSomeone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
we can build the base out of rock. Thank you. Anyone? Yes. In the blue shirt. Uh my name is Jim Hearnst. Uh this matter belongs before a court. I have no idea uh what representations are being made and no way to judge their veracity. They are not made under oath. They are not sworn. Uh they're not cross-examined