◉ Perfect World
Las Cruces ▾
← All checked meetings

Redline · June 16, 2025

Las Cruces Council Meeting - June 16th, 2025

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 93 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 92 were found in the recording.

Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

95match score /100
21,087words in the minutes
28,840words on the recording
3,120spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

1 difference

Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 9 differences

Chief Jeremy Story: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“not”)

Says something different

Both records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “not” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “people usually file a notice of tort within one year”.

What the minutes say

Chief Jeremy Story said I am not aware of anyone else doing three years. People usually file a notice of tort within one year and have three years to actually file that actual tort, so we are keeping video, that entire period in case something pops up in that three years.

What the recording says

the state are doing. I'm not a mayor mayor put I'm not aware of anyone else doing three years. Um, three years comes from generally under I believe and I can let uh Brad comment on this as well, but you know people usually file a not notice of tort within one year and then have three years to file the actual tort. So, we're keeping the video that entire period in case something pops up in that three years. Okay. Thank you. Um, yeah, I at

Hear it at 2:40:29Speaker as recorded: Chief Jeremy Story7 RESOLUTION(S) AND/OR ORDINANCE(S) FOR DISCUSSION 7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-150

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.