← All checked meetingsRedline · January 12, 2026
Las Cruces Council Work Session - January 12, 2026
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 34 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 34 were found in the recording.
Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
1 difference
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 9 differences
~1170 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “litigation”, “settlement”, “fraud”, “conflict of interest”, “investigation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
Thank you. Okay, I think we're good. So, we can move to the next uh item on the agenda 2.2, the annual inspector uh general brief. That'll be Mr. Charles Tucker. Let me get my glasses. Good afternoon, mayor. Good afternoon, council. I'm going to open up my slide deck here in a second. And uh Okay. What was it? F5. Thank you. I should have been paying more attention. I know you said it earlier and I couldn't remember. [clears throat] So, good afternoon. U. My name is Charles
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.