Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · January 2, 2024

Las Cruces Council Meeting - Jan 2, 2024

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 26 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 26 were found in the recording.

Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

94match score /100
7,534words in the minutes
13,637words on the recording
2,210spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

8 differences

Every difference the check found, including ones ordinary summarising explains. Show only the serious ones

“unlawful” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

there mayor mayor council Moma that is correct uh whenever this I'm sorry change names Quan my apologies no worries I'm just I'm I'm I'm unlabeling you there um essentially what it is is whenever any type of development does come into the property it does go for review throughout staff including the traffic engineering

“violation” is said 2× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

zone change is also the applicant doing the repat trying to create one piece one clean piece of property essentially property was previously used in violation of our current zoning code uh it's kind of been existing like that for a while now unfortunately uh it is located in the South mosqu overlay District our

“asbestos” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

the more Southern of the intersection there currently the property is Zone C1 commercial low intensity and R3 multi-dwelling medium intensity the existing C1 zoning aspect of the property is non-conforming considering our C1 uh commercial low intensity zoning designation has limitations on lot size as well as building sizes for commercial development so eventally

“ice” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes

Word never written down

A word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

and councel thank you city manager that's it oh okay thank you all for attending uh this was my first meeting I guess I owe ice cream so I'll take a motion to adjourn so moved Graham second this is on the motion to adjourn the meeting councelor McLure yes councelor matis yes councelor Graham

~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “conflict of interest”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

Music] mayor you're on you're on good afternoon good afternoon ladies and gentlemen welcome to the city council today is January 2nd 2024 it's approximately 1: p.m. and I'll call this meeting to order if we could please stand I'd like to continue with giving a moment of silence for our men and women as have served in the military our police and fire that protect our city and I'd also like uh a moment of Silent for our leadership in this community to do good work now if

“Julia Ruiz Greetings” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes

Speaker not named

Someone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

capacity in New Mexico for houses of pain or abortion clinics thank you thank you see hello my name is Julia Ruiz greetings Council mayor city manager my day started out no different than everyone else's getting ready to celebrate the new year with family and friends I had to pick up a few things at the grocery store so

Hear it at 33:29Speaker as recorded: Julia Ruiz Greetings

~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “racist”, “immigration”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

out as by Elevate Las crues as the Suburban Neighborhood Place type but do want to point out that this is immediately adjacent to right next to what we consider our uh Regional commercial Place type so as we all know this area shown here uh Stern right next right over here is Av the msia so it's right next to what we consider a regional commercial area as you can see this is kind of a little out of place especially for a road designated like Stern Drive being

~780 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes

Missing from the minutes

This part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “violation”, “racist”.

What the minutes say

Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.

What the recording says

over a year so because of that essentially the property now needs to be brought into compliance with our current code which is why we're here reviewing this zone change essentially as you can see here just a small portion of that Pro property is zone two the vast majority of it is Zone R4 just give you a bearing there's Bowman here uh South alendra and uh to the South you got South uh you got East Amadore just give you an idea of the area we have the

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.