Perfect World
Las Cruces
← All checked meetings

Redline · February 5, 2024

Las Cruces Council Meeting - Feb 5, 2024

The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 56 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 55 were found in the recording.

Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.

96match score /100
16,035words in the minutes
22,485words on the recording
1,690spoken words with no counterpart

Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026

1 difference

Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 11 differences

Flores: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“don't”)

Says something different

Both records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “don't” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “the stress of having paid a number of 10,000 20,000 to prevent flooding”.

What the minutes say

Councilor Flores said my concern is I think there is a development just south of that and that is where there has been some flooding due to the arroyo. I don’t know the years it was before I sat on city council but became aware of it going to community meetings when Ceil Levantino was our councilor in that district and there was an outcry by residents who lived there who had experienced flooding and everybody seems to think that these floods they only happen once in a blue moon but if that blue moon happens to be me, I am going to care about it. It’s going to affect a woman, an elderly couple who I think was Mr. and Mrs. White. I think Mr. White passed away from a heart condition that was attributed to the stress of having paid a number of $10,000/$20,000 to prevent flooding to happen and I think it happened a couple of times. My concern always is for the wellbeing of people and safety. Have there been any studies and of the proximity and development of homes that would be built there to the arroyo and I know that no one can predict when that arroyo would run but I know that right now it’s just like a huge dry gulch. So, has the city taken all necessary steps to ensure that in the

What the recording says

a Royo I don't know the years it was before I um sat on city council but became aware of it and going to community meetings when seal livatino was our coun in that district and uh there was an outcry by residents who Liv there who had experience that flooding and um and everybody seems to think that oh these floods they only happen once in a blue moon but if that blue moon happens to be me I'm going to care about it if it's going to affect a woman uh a couple an elderly couple who um I think it was Mr and Mrs White I think Mr White passed away from a heart condition that he attributed was attributed to the stress of having that flood and having paid um a number I don't know 10,000 $20,000 uh

Hear it at 1:36:14Speaker as recorded: Flores9 RESOLUTION(S) AND/OR ORDINANCE(S) FOR DISCUSSION 9.1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-080

Were you there?

If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.