← All checked meetingsRedline · March 11, 2024
Las Cruces Council Work Session - Mar 11, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 51 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 51 were found in the recording.
Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 11 differences
~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “racist”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
e [Music] e [Music] and you're on good afternoon everyone uh welcome to the city council work session today is Monday March 11th 2024 it's approximately 1 p.m. I mayor Enriquez um I'd like to start with a moment of silence uh for our military and for our police and fire and also want to extend our condolences to the mayor of the village of hatch who passed away uh Jim also known as Slim Whitlock so we could also remember him in our moment of silence thank
Enriquez: a negation on the recording is missing from the minutes (“not”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the recording contains “not” where the minutes have nothing — which reverses its sense. Around: “the whole county and city that we're do our thing and they're doing”.
What the minutes say
Mayor Enriquez said I just wanted to add yes I’m open to a joint session. Great question Councilor McClure, if there’s any overlapping we want to make sure to maximize the resources all the funds that we’re receiving until the whole county and city that we’re do our thing and they’re doing theirs and we’re spending the same amount of money and then getting different results. We want to maximize those resources. I was taking notes, so I was calling it kind of a Work Session in the future community livability that it fits one of the themes. We can address the Telshor Fund, and the cannabis, the opioid and look at some of the things that were addressed at the Budget Retreat such as the Parks, the MRA, the Real Time Crime Center and
What the recording says
but um perhaps they'd be open to the idea of a joint session thank [Music] you anyone else anything okay no thank you I just wanted to add yes I'm open to joint uh session for great question uh councelor McClure if there's any overlapping we want to make sure that we maximize the resources all the funds that we're receiving into the whole County and city that we're not doing our thing they they're doing theirs and we're spending the same amount of money for and and getting different results we want we want to maximize those resources and uh yeah I was taking notes and so I was calling it kind of a a work session in the future a community livability that it fits one of the themes and and we c
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.