← All checked meetingsRedline · June 10, 2024
Las Cruces Council Work Session- June 10, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 96 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 96 were found in the recording.
Summarised — gaps worth reading. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 14 differences
~650 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
position starts at 1807 the posting closes on the 17th we have an animal control officer for the city of Los cruus the posting starts at 1886 an hour and it closes on the 17th of this month we have a test support against Missile Range um that posting closes in August for Pet Boys we have an auto general service technician the pay starts at 29,000 and the posting closes on the 1st we also have a customer service specialist for Sheron Williams um for $15 an
John Harris: the minutes negate a sentence the recording does not (“hadn't”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the minutes contain “hadn't” where the recording has no negation. Around: “that we had a worldwide pandemic that hadn't caught our attention for four”.
What the minutes say
John Harris said the only thing that I would ask you to recognize is that I think between all of that is that we had a worldwide pandemic that hadn’t caught our attention for four years so.
What the recording says
an official vote so according to the agreement that was made many years ago that still is four to between four to 5% and so I understand that it's $8 million in investment and I would just like to understand what that how much the only thing I would ask you to recognize is I think between all of that we had a worldwide pandemic that that kind of caught our attention for four years so certain I think the other thing that has
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.