← All checked meetingsRedline · August 12, 2024
Las Cruces Council Work Session - August 12, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 9 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 8 were found in the recording.
Diverges from the recording. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 21 differences
~1040 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “lead”, “contamination”, “condemnation”, “eviction”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
e e e [Music] you're live good afternoon everyone thank you for joining us today for our city council work session today's August 12th uh 2024 it's approximately 1 p.m. uh if you all join me for if we could stand for a moment of silence for our men and women of the military and our police and fire that protect our City 247 if you join us in the pledge to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands
~3125 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 1 person introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “lawsuit”, “violation”, “racist”, “immigration”, “deportation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
each year just a little brief history on the commission uh the historical preservation commission was created in 2019 uh to assist in implementing the historical preservation ordinance and the plan the commission uh is primary duties and interests is a protection of the and preservation of historical buildings as they are an essential component of our City's Heritage they have um they collaborate uh with the Community Development Department and the city manager's office to advise the city on historical districts and create uh cultural properties uh we Community
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.