← All checked meetingsRedline · October 28, 2024
Las Cruces Council Work Session - October 28, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 15 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 15 were found in the recording.
Diverges from the recording. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
2 differences
Differences that ordinary summarising does not explain — words nobody said, figures and negations that disagree, vote rolls that don’t add up, and stretches where somebody spoke and went unrecorded. Show all 10 differences
~7280 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “settlement”, “fine”, “falsify”, “investigation”, “racist”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
oh e e e [Music] you're live good afternoon everyone welcome to the work session today is Monday October 28th 2024 it is a approximately 100 p.m. I am mayor proen bomo mayor Enriquez is um out of town at a municipal League conference today we will start with a moment of silence for the brave men and women of the United States armed forces as they protect our interest around the globe as well as the courageous men and women of the Los Cruses police department and
Juan Garcia: the minutes negate a sentence the recording does not (“shouldn't”)
Says something differentBoth records carry the same sentence, but they disagree on a number or on whether it was negative. The same sentence appears in both records, but the minutes contain “shouldn't” where the recording has no negation. Around: “more money to better our parks but it shouldn't be for criminal activity”.
What the minutes say
Juan Garcia, Member of the Public said this morning there was an article on KFox where various parks in Las Cruces were identified as drug havens for users, addicts and overdoses. Something has to change because citizens of this community don’t deserve this deplorable environment. You want more money to better our parks, but it shouldn’t be for criminal activity. Although my initial reaction to OPC is no and I did see the movie, Love in the Age of Fentanyl. If these centers can be used as a conduit to treatment forced through the judicial system or volunteer this may be an option to consider and I stress, may be. There has to be consequences and there has to be a center to facilitate illicit drug use and further enable the already horrible human destruction going on. We can’t have Las Cruces continue to be a haven magnet for homeless, criminals, but potentially now with OPC increase drug users in the city leading to even more criminal activity.
What the recording says
we will provide 2 minutes today mayor protim council ju Garcia this morning there was an article on K Fox where various parks and L crues were identified as drug Havens for users addicts and overdoses something has to change because citizens of this community don't deserve this deplorable environment you want more money for better bet to better our Parks but itum to be for criminal activity although my initial reaction to OPC is no and I did see the movie loving the age of fanel if if these centers can be used as a conduit to treatment forc through the judicial system or volunteer this may be an option to consider and And I stress maybe there have to be consequences and not just an open-ende
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.