← All checked meetingsRedline · December 16, 2024
Las Cruces Council Meeting - December 16, 2024
The city’s minutes for this meeting were compared, sentence by sentence, against the transcript of the recording. Of 14 statements the minutes attribute to a named person, 14 were found in the recording.
Tracks the recording closely. The comparison is mechanical and has no opinion about why two documents differ. A gap can be honest summarising; a mismatch can be the caption software mishearing. Both texts are shown so you can decide, and the correction form at the bottom is there for when the machine is wrong.
Watch the recording · Read the minutes as text · The city’s original PDF · checked 8/14/2026
~1820 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. 2 people introduce themselves by name inside this gap. It contains: “conflict of interest”, “resign”, “lead”, “contamination”, “cancer”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
e e e [Music] you are on good afternoon everyone welcome to the city council meeting today is Monday December 16th 2024 it's approximately 1 p.m. I'm mayor Enriquez before we start I want to mention that we have an ASL uh American sign language are they here today yes um available to interpret and uh they're here at all our regular city meetings they're in the front there on my right uh we will start with a moment of silence if you all please stand for the
“noncompliance” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
that we had earlier today so I'll go back to public participation we will allow up to 3 minutes no pending litigation on items on non-consent so Katrina will assist anyone on my left side that wants to come up and speak for three minutes three minutes I feel like I won the lottery good
“surveillance” is said 1× on the recording and never appears in the minutes
Word never written downA word with legal, financial or health weight was said aloud and never written down. A word that carries legal, financial or health weight was spoken during the meeting but is absent from the written record of it.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
are federal funds awarded through the New Mexico Department of Public Safety in the amount of $192,100 to purchase and install six Dual Purpose modular surveillance systems as well as to train officers on how to use this system the selected locations for these cameras are focused focused on areas where there is currently No
“Jane Ash Honorable” introduces themselves on the recording and is not named in the minutes
Speaker not namedSomeone gave their name on the recording and is nowhere in the minutes. Someone identified themselves by name during the meeting — usually a member of the public taking the microphone — but that name appears nowhere in the written record. Caption spellings of names are unreliable, so confirm against the recording before relying on this.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
proposed Animal Welfare trust fund we should all welcome it and not criticize it thank you [Applause] my name is Jane Ash honorable mayor and City councilors I'm here today on behalf of my good friend Sandra bacq an 82-year-old woman suffering from a number of medical and physical dis disabilities and living on a very low income the
~260 words of the recording have no counterpart in the minutes
Missing from the minutesThis part of the meeting left no trace in the written record. This stretch of the meeting is not reflected anywhere in the written record. Some gaps are legitimate — recesses, or a presentation summarised in one line. Others are discussion that simply did not make it in. It contains: “investigation”, “contamination”, “condemnation”.
What the minutes say
Nothing — this passage is absent from the minutes.
What the recording says
aside for veterans and 60 that are set aside for Workforce Development the resolution if approved today uh would would make a $1.35 million commitment um including impact fee waivers contingent upon uh the public housing authority maintaining their qualifying grantee status and being awarded a 9% low-income housing tax credit application um they will be competing um over the the first quarter of the year um if they were awarded then we would come back with the future resolution at which time we would identify the funding source and
Were you there?
If the machine got something wrong, or if you can say what was actually said, put it on the record. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.